
Legal Briefs Usually Don’t Need To Be Perfect
Although no judge has ever rejected a legal brief because it was too well written, edited, and proofed, a diminished return on investment is reached at a certain point.
Although no judge has ever rejected a legal brief because it was too well written, edited, and proofed, a diminished return on investment is reached at a certain point.
If written effectively, a brief can put a judge on your side of an issue before you ever step foot in a courtroom.
"Decrypting Crypto" is a go-to guide for understanding the technology and tools underlying Web3 and issues raised in the context of specific legal practice areas.
Could this become a trend in the federal appellate courts?
Protip: when in the Ninth Circuit, avoid filing an overlength brief at all costs.
Why does it make sense to share briefs you've previously written with the outside world?
Can you believe someone filed something this hideous in court?
Discover five practical ways to harness AI and eliminate busywork—so you can focus more on your clients and less on repetitive tasks.
What are the hallmarks of the "big firm mediocre" writing style? In-house columnist Mark Herrmann identifies them.
Litigators, how should you NOT open a brief?
Here’s my thesis: We create rules to hedge against ineptitude, and we thus institutionalize mediocrity. Here are the examples. First, someone — the Administrative Office of the Courts? God? — creates rules to hedge against incomprehensible judicial opinions, and we thus discourage judges from writing exceptional opinions. When new federal appellate judges attend what is […]
Hey 1Ls, is law school getting you down? Are you tired of doing your 1L bitchwork, like briefing cases? Then have we got a deal for you! For the low, low price of a weekly cup of coffee, you can outsource all of your undesirable tasks to an up-and-coming sucker! Because why try your hardest to succeed when you can get someone else to do it for you?